First of all we are weighting the targeting towards wider divisions being more likely targets and also when picking targets to try and match it to have wider divisions spread damage over smaller rather than always concentrating it.
Essentially the larger divisions make more efficient use of concentrated damage as it punches through defense. One of the major things that make larger divisions like 40 width armor hit disproportionally harder than smaller ones is also how targeting and damage works inside combat in relation to the enemies defense. But at the same time, smaller countries should now be able to specialize their division width to suit their home terrain more appropriately. We hope that this will alleviate some of the need to have divisions that are the perfect width for a given province. In conjunction with these changes, we have also been looking at reducing the overstacking penalty. The total sum of the compositions will still end up 100% (unless every battalion is without equipment). When counting the battalions of armies (ie when we have an actual unit and not only a division template), battalions that lack equipment will count as less, so a Light Tank battalion with only half it's tanks will count as 0.5 battalions (and not count at all if without tanks). The exceptions being rocket & special forces, which both act as an addition, so if the 3 infantry divisions in the example above were mountain units, then the division would also be 60% special forces and if the 2 artillery are nebelwerfers it'd also be 40% rocket This system has now changed, and divisions get bonuses based on their composition, this is a straight up ratio based on the number of non-support battalions of each type, so a 2x artillery 3x infantry division will be 40% artillery 60% infantry.īattalions are always classified as a single type for this (even though some are scripted with multiple types) based on this priority:Ĭavalry > armor > artillery > motorized > mechanized > infantry
0 kommentar(er)
